While organizations often focus on individual team performance, the real measure of organizational effectiveness lies in how teams work together. The connections, handoffs, and interactions between teams - what we call team interfaces - often determine whether an organization succeeds or struggles.
Team interfaces are the formal and informal protocols that govern how different groups within an organization share information, make decisions, and coordinate their efforts. Former General Stanley McChrystal describes this concept powerfully: "The ability to create a system where different groups can productively interact matters more than how well each group performs in isolation."
A comprehensive team interface encompasses multiple elements that work in concert. It begins with established information sharing and communication channels that keep all parties informed. These channels support clear decision-making protocols and authority boundaries that prevent confusion or delays. The interface must also address resource allocation agreements and workflow dependencies, ensuring smooth handoffs between groups. Perhaps most importantly, it requires shared goals and success metrics that align teams toward common objectives.
Most organizational friction occurs not within teams but at their boundaries.
Harvard professor Amy Edmondson notes, "The most common team failures happen at the seams - where one team's work must connect with another's."
This friction often manifests as duplicate efforts when teams work in isolation, or as information bottlenecks when communication channels break down. Teams frequently struggle with unclear decision rights, leading to either paralysis or conflict. Resource conflicts emerge when allocation protocols aren't well defined, while misaligned priorities can derail even the best-intentioned collaboration.
Creating effective team interfaces requires intentional design and ongoing maintenance. Teams need explicit agreements about which decisions require consultation and how information should be shared. These protocols must address issue escalation and methods for resolving conflicts between competing priorities.
For interfaces to function effectively, teams must share common understanding about organizational goals and each team's role in achieving them. This shared mental model extends to understanding constraints, dependencies between work streams, and success criteria for joint efforts. When teams clearly understand both their own limitations and those of their partners, they can work together more effectively.
Some organizations benefit from designated roles that focus specifically on team connections. Integration specialists and cross-functional project managers can help bridge gaps between groups, while department liaisons ensure consistent communication. However, these roles should facilitate rather than replace direct team-to-team interaction.
While technology can support team interfaces, it shouldn't define them. Effective technological support focuses on enabling human interaction rather than replacing it. Shared documentation and knowledge bases provide common reference points, while visible project tracking systems help teams coordinate their efforts. Communication platforms need to facilitate rather than complicate interaction, and resource management tools should clarify rather than constrain allocation decisions.
Organizations must look beyond individual team metrics to assess interface effectiveness. The speed of cross-team decision making provides one key indicator, while the quality of handoffs between groups offers another. Organizations should examine how frequently coordination problems arise and how efficiently resources are utilized across team boundaries. Customer satisfaction with end-to-end processes often reveals interface effectiveness more clearly than any internal metric.
Improving team interfaces requires ongoing attention and adjustment. Organizations should regularly review interface effectiveness and adjust protocols based on feedback. Investment in cross-team relationships pays dividends through smoother collaboration, while prompt attention to interface problems prevents small issues from becoming major obstacles.
Organizations with well-designed team interfaces gain significant competitive advantages through faster response to opportunities and more efficient resource use. Knowledge flows more freely across team boundaries, spawning innovation and improving problem-solving capability. Perhaps most importantly, employees experience greater satisfaction when they can work effectively with colleagues across organizational boundaries.
As organizations become more complex, the quality of team interfaces will increasingly determine their success. Leaders must shift focus from optimizing individual team performance to designing and maintaining the connections between teams. This means creating systems that promote collaboration while maintaining clear accountability and efficient operations.
The most successful organizations will be those that master not just team building, but team connecting - creating an environment where the whole truly becomes greater than the sum of its parts. This requires ongoing attention to the spaces between teams, ensuring that every interface serves its purpose in enabling organizational success.
Learn more about the work that we do and the programs that we offer. Set up a call to start planning how you want to change the culture of your organization.
With 25 years of award-winning coaching and leadership experience, Indra has a passion for helping companies, teams, and individuals bring about meaningful, goal-oriented transformations which are firmly grounded in Agile principles. She currently works from Spain with companies around the world to achieve sustainable growth based on true agility; helping them make value-based changes and see results with high-performing teams.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
AFA provides coaching, consulting, and training programs. In addition to specialized consulting, you have the option to choose from: